This is my article...
More content here...
Mohit Koli
Senior Full Stack Developer
September 24, 2025
15 min read
Before you grab your pitchforks, let me be clear: I'm not an AI hater. I use GitHub Copilot daily, and I've seen the productivity boosts firsthand. But after three years of watching developers—including myself—become increasingly dependent on AI coding assistants, I've witnessed something alarming: we're getting worse at the fundamentals of programming.
Recent research reveals that 66% of developers find AI-generated code "almost right, but not quite," and 45% spend more time debugging AI code than writing it from scratch. Even more concerning, studies show that when experienced developers use AI tools, they actually take 19% longer to complete complex tasks.
I recently watched a junior developer struggle to write a simple `for` loop without AI assistance. Not because they didn't understand loops, but because they had become so dependent on autocomplete suggestions that manual coding felt foreign. This isn't an isolated incident—it's becoming the norm.
Our brains are remarkably efficient at discarding information we don't regularly use. When AI handles syntax, function names, and API documentation, developers stop building the mental models necessary for deep programming knowledge. This "digital amnesia" is real and measurable.
Perhaps most critically, developers are losing the ability to break complex problems into smaller, manageable pieces. AI provides solutions, but it doesn't teach the thinking process that leads to those solutions. This is creating a generation of developers who can implement but can't architect.
AI models are trained on public code repositories, including millions of lines of insecure code. The result? AI assistants confidently suggest outdated patterns, insecure dependencies, and vulnerability-prone implementations.
Recent security audits reveal that projects using AI coding assistants show:
AI-generated code often looks professional and well-structured, creating a false sense of security. Developers, especially junior ones, may not recognize subtle security flaws that experienced programmers would catch immediately. This leads to vulnerable code being deployed to production with misplaced confidence.
The most insidious issue with AI coding assistants isn't that they produce obviously wrong code—it's that they produce code that's tantalizingly close to correct. This "almost right" code is often harder to debug than starting from scratch.
AI assistants lack understanding of your specific business logic, architectural constraints, and project requirements. They generate syntactically correct code that may violate your team's patterns, performance requirements, or domain rules. The result is code that works but doesn't fit.
AI-generated code often takes shortcuts that create technical debt. It might solve the immediate problem but do so in a way that makes future changes difficult. Without understanding the broader codebase, AI can't make the architectural decisions that lead to maintainable software.
I've seen developers panic when their AI assistant goes offline during a coding session. Not because they've lost a helpful tool, but because they've lost what feels like an essential capability. This psychological dependence is perhaps the most concerning aspect of the AI coding revolution.
Hiring managers are starting to notice candidates who perform well in take-home assignments but struggle during live coding interviews where AI assistance isn't available. This disconnect reveals the extent to which some developers have become dependent on AI for basic programming tasks.
The solution isn't to abandon AI tools—they're too valuable for that. Instead, we need to use them strategically while maintaining our core programming competencies. Here's how to strike the right balance.
Set aside regular time for AI-free coding. Start with 30 minutes daily where you write code without any assistance. This maintains your problem-solving muscles and keeps syntax fresh in your memory.
Never accept AI-generated code without fully understanding what it does. Read every line, understand the logic, and consider alternative approaches. If you can't explain the code to a colleague, you shouldn't use it.
Instead of asking AI to write code for you, ask it to explain concepts, suggest alternative approaches, or review your own code. This transforms AI from a crutch into a powerful tutor that enhances your learning.
Continue to read official documentation and source code, even when AI can provide quick answers. This deep understanding helps you make better architectural decisions and catch subtle AI mistakes.
Yes. Studies show that a significant percentage of AI-generated code contains security vulnerabilities. This is because AI models are trained on vast amounts of public code, which includes insecure patterns. Over-reliance on AI without proper code review can lead to vulnerabilities like data exposure and insecure dependencies.
Junior developers should focus on building fundamental skills before heavily relying on AI. It's recommended to limit AI usage initially and practice coding manually. When using AI, they should treat it as a tutor by asking it to explain concepts rather than just generating code, and always ensure they understand the code before accepting it.
Skill degradation refers to the weakening of a developer's core programming abilities due to over-dependence on AI tools. This includes forgetting basic syntax, losing the ability to decompose complex problems, and a decline in critical thinking and code comprehension skills, as the AI handles these cognitive tasks.
AI coding assistants aren't inherently evil—they're powerful tools that can significantly enhance productivity when used correctly. The problem arises when we let them replace our thinking instead of augmenting it.
The developers who thrive in the AI era won't be those who use AI the most, nor those who avoid it entirely. They'll be the ones who forge a healthy partnership with AI while diligently preserving their core programming competencies.
Remember: AI should amplify your skills, not replace them. Use it as a powerful assistant, but always remain the architect of your code. Your future self—and your career—will thank you for it.
Start practicing these techniques today to maintain your programming skills while leveraging AI effectively.
Senior Full Stack Developer & AI Realist
Mohit has been using AI coding tools since their early days and has witnessed firsthand their impact on developer skills. With over 3 years in full-stack development, he advocates for responsible AI usage that enhances rather than replaces human expertise. He regularly mentors developers on maintaining their core programming skills in the age of AI.
January 18, 2025 • 10 min read
Explore the cognitive biases that affect how developers adopt new technologies...
January 20, 2025 • 8 min read
Learn how to audit and secure AI-generated code in your projects...
This is my article...
More content here...